![]()
Part 2 Real Estate Licensing Laws Are Not Strict Enough
Real Estate Train Derailment: “Degreed Brokers”
In Colorado, in order to become a real estate broker, one must have a
salesperson license and two-years full time experience. California’s Real
Estate Commissioner has the authority to substitute a broker applicant’s
(two-years full time) sale experience with a degree from a four-year
college or university.
Similar to the dramatic increase of the lightweight “Condition Sales
License”, California has experienced an alarming rise in “Degreed
Brokers.” The California Association of Realtors, (C.A.R.), was policing
its own by sponsored State Assembly bill AB 1963 (Leslie) which
eliminated the commissioner’s ability to accept a broker applicant’s
four-year degree in lieu of two-years of full-time real estate sales
experience.
In 2006, Governor Schwarzenegger returned (unsigned) AB 1963 (Leslie)
to the State Assembly, stating the bill is “removing a provision that has
been in existence for over thirty years,” and would “place further
impediments on those seeking to start a business and work independently.”
Governor, we ask a carpenter to provide work experience, before applying
for a contractor’s license, to protect consumers while he or she works on
your property. However, in order to sell, finance or manage that same
property, No Work Experience Is Needed? Real estate transactions in
the double 00’s have little in common with transactions in the 1970’s.
Anyone involved in a real estate transaction in the last ten years can
attest to that. Thirty years ago the sales contracts were one legal page
long and “caveat emptor” ruled. California Association of Realtors, (CAR),
was sponsoring last year’s AB 1963 “to create higher standards for
managing brokers in order to increase the knowledge and accountability
of all agents when conducting transactions.” Scary thought: “Degreed
Brokers” never represented parties in commercial and/or residential
sales, property management or financing. Having worked in all three
fields it baffles me how anyone could competently train and supervise
agents and their activities/transaction with what in most cases, are
consumers’ largest investment. California consumers!
The old saying “there is no substitute for experience” is especially true
in real estate. Real estate attorneys are the first to admit they don’t
know the day-to-day workings of a real estate professional. That’s
why they hire “expert court witnesses.” (To explain the Standard of
Care and Standard of Practice in a specific field of real estate)
This year, C.A.R sponsored SB 226 (Negrete McLeod) Degreed Broker
Requirements, which mandates, before the Commissioner grants
exemption for two-years sale experience, that the broker applicant
must have a major or minor in real estate.
Why will such a completely watered-down version of last year’s
“Degreed Broker” law, land on the Governor’s desk? Politics.
Pat Kapowich,
“Negotiating Smooth Transactions Throughout The South Bay”
SiliconValleyBroker.com
![]()
5 responses so far ↓
1 Brian Brady // Jul 6, 2007 at 3:52 pm
I think what Governor Schwazenegger understands is that occupational licensing has no teeth and is anti-consumer.
CAR is practicing a “take care of their own” approach when they lobbied for this bill. Where was this bill in 2003 when the market was heating up? CAR was all too happy to collect fees from any college grad that passed the broker’s test.
2 Pat Kapowich // Jul 10, 2007 at 6:39 am
Thanks Brian from San Diego. I missed your comment while visiting in San Diego of all places! That said, I would have like to discuss this in person to detect if you are serious and/or just promoting Greg Swann’s dialogue/cyber-space debate regarding outlawing “licensing laws.” (If you were wearing a belt with those suspenders, then you couldn’t be serious) Either way, I’m in.
If what you write could possibly be true: My response would be “What didn’t the Governor know and when didn’t he know it”?
Licensing laws has enough teeth to make most licensed-mandated professionals concerned about compliance with their field’s governing body, (e.g., complaints, continuing educational requirements, changing laws and/or Standards of Practice) In addition, these governing bodies are in place to protect consumers’ time, money and safety.
Any real estate attorney will tell you they can “put their kids through college” after a “hot” market. It’s hard to take complaints seriously when properties are appreciating month after month. (i.e., How has the Buyer been damaged?) However, when the market cools and properties are deprecating , complaints and lawsuits against agents and sellers skyrocket.
While both the California Department of Real Estate and California Association of Realtors has overworked staff swamped with complaints, the Governor is still encouraging newly commissioned officers to board on a sinking ship.
3 Inside the Santa Clara County Association of Realtors' Convention. Buyer beware? No. It's Licensees Beware. // Sep 24, 2007 at 8:28 pm
[…] freely admitted this is important to CAR’s ‘07/’08 budget. Many, like Brian Brady felt CAR was all to happy to collect fees and questioned its earnestness lobbying tougher licensing…. Flawed thinking, read […]
4 Inside the Santa Clara County Association of Realtors' Convention. Buyer beware? No. It's Licensees Beware. // Dec 21, 2007 at 5:51 am
[…] freely admitted this is important to CAR’s ‘07/’08 budget. Many, like Brian Brady felt CAR was all to happy to collect fees and questioned its earnestness lobbying tougher licensing … Flawed thinking, read […]
5 Real Estate and Mortgage Fraud, "The Investigative Process" ~ Inside Santa Clara County Association of REALTORS' General Membership Meeting // Feb 9, 2008 at 7:04 am
[…] freely admitted this is important to CAR’s ‘07/’08 budget. Many, like Brian Brady felt CAR was all to happy to collect fees and questioned its earnestness lobbying tougher licensing … Flawed thinking, read […]
Leave a Comment