SiliconValleyBroker.com header image 1

Congrats to the Savvy New Santa Clara County Homeowners! Silicon Valley Real Estate Housing Sales Report for Santa Clara County ~ Pics, Graphs & Stats ~ January 2010 vs December 2008

February 6th, 2010 · No Comments

The Jan/2010 Santa Clara County (SCC), Real Estate Sales Report for Single-Family Homes saw a closing of 593 sales receiving 98.91% of list price. These closings represented a median price of $530,825 and an average price of $666,729. There were 1,321 new listings reported to the MLS during Jan/2010. Total Sales: $394,703,793

The Dec/2008 Santa Clara County (SCC), Real Estate Sales Report for Single-Family Homes saw a closing of 677 sales receiving 97.28% of list price. These closings represented a median price of $512,450 and an average price of $657,842. There were 1,059 new listings reported to the MLS during December. Total Sales: $444,701,772

100_5816.jpg

Single Family Homes

sccsfrprices.jpeg

Jan/2010~SCC Condos/Townhouses had 232 closed sales receiving 99.85% of list price. These closings represented a median price of $321,000 and an average price of $368,681. There were 522 new listings reported to the MLS during Jan/2010. Total Sales: $85,534,059

Dec/2008~SCC Condos/Townhouses had 208 closed sales receiving 96.49% of list price. These closings represented a median price of $312,500 and an average price of $368,525. There were 385 new listings reported to the MLS during December. Total Sales: $76,653,267

silicon1.jpg

Santa Clara County Condos & Townhouses

sccctprices.jpeg

Days on Market

Jan/2010~Single-Family Homes in SCC had an average of 65 days on
market (DOM). Condos/Townhouses had an average of 73 DOM.

Dec/2008~Single-Family Homes in SCC had an average of 92 days on
market (DOM). Condos/Townhouses had an average of 82 DOM.

100_5641.jpg

→ No CommentsTags: Buying/Selling · Stats ~ Housing Updates

Foundation Issues, Retaining Walls, Grading, Sloping, Drainage with Mark Garrison of MG Constructors and Engineers ~ # 146

February 6th, 2010 · No Comments

Kapowich on Real Estate Program # 146 from Ryan Kapowich on Vimeo.

Mark Garrison

MG Constructors & Engineers, Inc.

408.842.5599

→ No CommentsTags: Buying/Selling · Distressed Properties/Sellers · Videos ~ Experts Interviewed

De Anza College class brought to you by Pat Kapowich “Buying & Selling Distressed Properties” Saturday, 2/27 @ 9AM-12PM ~ Featuring Real Estate Attorney Julia Wei!

February 6th, 2010 · No Comments

Pat’s next De Anza class features guest speaker Real Estate Attorney Julia Wei!

Managing Risk, Expectations & Results with Lender Controlled Properties

Buyer and Seller Beware: Only prepared buyers and sellers should enter into transactions involving distressed properties. Short sales, pre-foreclosures and foreclosures are fraught with potential missteps and ramifications that are normally not found in an already stressful situation ~ the buying or selling of a home. Banks have become more aggressive toward buyers, sellers and their representative. Learning all sides of a transaction is paramount when negotiating, especially when the banks have loss mitigation departments that are overwhelmed and/or ill prepared.

small6593

Be a Savvy Consumer and Learn the Particulars:
• Loan Modifications vs Short Sales
• Short-Sales vs Foreclosures
• Pre-Foreclosure & Foreclosures
• Debt Relief Tax Consequences
• Banks Demanding Loss Repayment
• Agent Contracts vs Bank Contracts
• Dealing with Multiple Lenders

Instructors: Real Estate Attorney Julia Wei is a specialist in lending, escrow, title and bank controlled properties. Pat Kapowich is the Broker/Owner of Kapowich Real Estate in Cupertino. Pat is also a contributor to the Saturday Q & A column Market Wise in the San Jose Mercury News.

RSVP

Where: De Anza College
When: Saturday, February 27th, 2010
Time: 9AM to 12PM
Room: G-3
Fee: $39.00

→ No CommentsTags: Buying/Selling · Classes/Forums/Seminars · Distressed Properties/Sellers · Empty Suits/Bushwhackers

Silicon Valley Real Estate Housing Sales for City of Los Gatos ~ Q4/2009 vs Q4/2006 ~ Map, Graph, Stats & Pics

February 6th, 2010 · No Comments

The Q4/ 2009 Silicon Valley Real Estate Housing Sales Report for Los Gatos Single-Family Homes saw a closing of 81 sales receiving 95.35% of list price. These closings represented a median price of $1,249,675 and an average price of $1,332,355. There were 99 new listings reported to the MLS for Q4/2009. Total Sales: $107,920,828

The Q4 2006 Silicon Valley Real Estate Housing Sales Report for Los Gatos Single-Family Homes saw a closing of 83 sales receiving 97.96% of list price. These closings represented a median price of $1,355,000 and an average price of $1,538,690. There were 71 new listings reported to the MLS for Q4/2006.  Total Sales: $127,711,320

Real Estate Market Chart by Altos Research www.altosresearch.com



View Larger Map

Q4 2009~Los Gatos Condos/Townhouses had 27 closed sales receiving 97.13% of list price. These closings represented a median price of $607,500 and an average price of $606,761. There were 39 new listings reported to the MLS for Q4/2009. Total Sales: $16,382,550

Q4/2006~Los Gatos Condos/Townhouses had 23 closed sales receiving 97.96% of list price. These closings represented a median price of $645,000 and an average price of 653,365. There were 30 new listings reported to the MLS for Q4/2006. Total Sales: $15,027,400

Real Estate Market Chart by Altos Research www.altosresearch.com

100_3853.jpg

Q4/2009~Single-Family Homes in January had an average of 84 days on market (DOM). Condos/Townhouses had an average of 136 DOM.

Q4/2007~Single-family homes in January had an average of 75 DOM and 75 CDOM. Condos/Townhouses had an average of 66 DOM and 66 CDOM.

100_3858.jpg

KAPOWICH REAL ESTATE derives many benefits from its
memberships in the National Association of Realtors,
the California Association of Realtors, the Silicon Valley
Association of Realtors. Not the least of which is
their statistical information on real estate transactions.

→ No CommentsTags: Buying/Selling · Stats ~ Housing Updates

Buyer Unhappy with Seller Repairs Still Rings True Today ~ San Jose Mercury News Q&A

February 6th, 2010 · No Comments

Pat Kapowich for the San Jose Mercury News

Q ~ We sold our house in August 1998. Before the sale, an inspection
of the bathroom floor revealed some water damage. The inspector
did not find structural damage. We replace the vinyl and wood under
the floor. Later the inspector cleared the bathroom and the buyer
signed off on it. In June this year, the buyer returned and said the
work was unsatisfactory. He wants us to pay for additional work.
Should we?

Unique house illuminated in blue

A ~ If you completed the work, the termite company only states the
home is free of infestation and will not warranty any of the workmanship
or materials. Your contract should hold your answer. Did the contract
have a repair clause? If so, did it say all the work must be completed by
a licensed contractor, using good materials, workmanship, building codes
and permits? Did the buyer have a right to inspect the work and approve
the completed results? Home sellers often try to save money on repairs
that often come back to haunt them. More than 90 percent of real estate
disputes involve buyers going after sellers in a case similiar to your own.
Let your contract be your guide.


Real Estate Virtual Forum
Saturday, September 18, 1999

Do you have a question for the new real estate Q&A Market Wise column in the SJMN? If so, please email them to: info@SiliconValleyBroker.com

→ No CommentsTags: Buying/Selling · Market Wise Q&A in SJMN

Top Ten Topics by Ten of the Top Silicon Valley Real Estate Attorneys (Free Legal Advice)

February 6th, 2010 · No Comments

Kapowich on Real Estate ~ Top Ten

→ No CommentsTags: Buying/Selling · Distressed Properties/Sellers · Empty Suits/Bushwhackers · Videos ~ Experts Interviewed

City of Campbell Real Estate Housing Sale Report ~ January 2009 vs February 2007 ~ Graphs, Map & Stats

February 6th, 2010 · No Comments

January 2009 ~ The Campbell Silicon Valley Real Estate Sales Report for Single-Family Homes saw a closing of 11 sales receiving 99.79% of list price. These closings represented a median price of $655,000 and an average price of $658,181. There were 31 new listings reported to the MLS during January. Total Sales: $7,240,000

vs

February 2007 ~ The Campbell Silicon Valley Real Estate Sales Report for Single-Family Homes saw a closing of 35 sales receiving 99.72% of list price. These closings represented a median price of $745,000 and an average price of $769,377. There were 68 new listings reported to the MLS during February. Total Sales: $26,928,211

Real Estate Market Chart by Altos Research www.altosresearch.com

100_3848.jpg

January 2009 ~ Campbell Condos/Townhouses had 6 closed sales receiving 99.43% of list price. These closings represented a median price of $396,000 and an average price of $406,333. There were 23 new listings reported to the MLS during January. Total Sales: $2,438,000

vs

February 2007 ~ Zone Campbell Condos/Townhouses had 25 closed sales receiving 99.39% of list price. These closings represented a median price of $510,000 and an average price of $519,474. There were 33 new listings reported to the MLS during the month of February.  Total Sales: $12,986,856

Real Estate Market Chart by Altos Research www.altosresearch.com
View Larger Map

January 2009 ~ Single-Family Homes in Campbell had an average of 33 days
on market (DOM). Condos/Townhouses had an average of 54 DOM.

vs

February 2007 ~ Single-Family Homes in Campbell had an average of 49 DOM and 65 CDOM. Condos/Townhouses had an average of 36 DOM and 53 CDOM.

campbell-sfmf.png

100_3846.jpg

KAPOWICH REAL ESTATE derives many benefits from its
memberships in the National Association of Realtors,
the California Association of Realtors, the Silicon Valley
Association of Realtors. Not the least of which is
their statistical information on real estate transactions.

→ No CommentsTags: Buying/Selling · Stats ~ Housing Updates

Pat’s San Jose Mercury News’ Market Wise Q&A column: Any Compensation for Recycled Inspection Reports?

February 3rd, 2010 · No Comments

Pat Kapowich for the San Jose Mercury News

Q: Recently, for the second time, we canceled transactions due to the condition of each home. Both sellers had cursory or no inspections that truly revealed the state of each property. Our buyer’s agent explained that it is protocol to send each report to the seller’s agent as soon as it is generated. It occurred to us that the reports we paid for have an extended shelf life beyond the failed transactions. We feel it is unfair that inspections on our dime are passed along to other parties. Our agent said that each seller can and should pass these reports along to future buyers. If that is the case, shouldn’t we get some compensation for these reports, regardless of their value?

Sand-glass on dollars

A: No. Your reports have already paid for themselves by way of their original and main purpose to help in moving forward with a sale or not. Since the reports prompted you to cancel a sale, it was money well spent. There is no economic recycling of old reports. Sometimes another consumer will call an inspector back to the property and pay him or her a small fee for a walk-through with the old report.

Sadly, what you experienced is quite common and equally avoidable. Sellers and/or the listing agents can actually promote buyer’s remorse to the point of rescission by not properly disclosing the property’s condition, warts and all, prior to a sale. Posting a disclosure package online reduces surprises and boosts a consumer’s confidence in her or his purchase.

Many sellers and their agents will spend frustrating weeks and months working toward a sale, only to have it fall apart after the buyers change their minds. These are the same sellers and listing agents who just can’t get their arms around the idea that the expense and time involved posting a disclosure package pays huge dividends.Homes that have complete disclosure packages online prior to negotiations will generate more and/or stronger offers with fewer days on the market. Plus, these are the sales that tend to stay sold.

Send questions to Pat@SiliconValleyBroker.com

Pat Kapowich, SiliconValleyBroker.com, owns Kapowich Real Estate in Cupertino. Send questions to pat@siliconvalleybroker.com.

→ No CommentsTags: Buying/Selling · Distressed Properties/Sellers · Market Wise Q&A in SJMN

Silicon Valley Real Estate Housing Sales for San Jose’s Blossom Valley ~ 2009 vs 2006 ~ Map, Stats & Graphs

February 3rd, 2010 · No Comments

The 2009 Completed Sales Report for Blossom Valley Single-Family Homes saw a closing of 676 sales receiving 100.88% of list price. These closings represented a median price of $485,000 and an average price of $502,193.
There were 916 new listings reported to the MLS in 2009.
Total Sales: $339,483,105

vs

The 2006 Completed Sales Report for Blossom Valley Single-Family Homes saw a closing of 756 sales receiving 100.28% of list price. These closings represented a median price of $710,000 and an average price of $728,736.
There were 1,291 new listings reported to the MLS in 2006.
Total Sales: $550,924,790

Real Estate Market Chart by Altos Research www.altosresearch.com



View Larger Map

2009~Blossom Valley Condos/Townhouses had 464 closed sales receiving 99.62% of list price. These closings represented a median price of $220,500 and an average price of $244,186. There were 656 new listings reported to the MLS in 2009.
Total Sales: $113,302,495

vs

2006~Blossom Valley Condos/Townhouses had 617 closed sales receiving 100.02% of list price. These closings represented a median price of $455,000 and an average price of $467,319. There were 1,099 new listings reported to the MLS in 2006.
Total Sales: $288,236,255

Real Estate Market Chart by Altos Research www.altosresearch.com

2009~Single-Family Homes in Blossom Valley had an average of 75 days on market (DOM). Condos/Townhouses had an average of 80 DOM.

2006~Single-Family Homes in Blossom Valley had an average of 61 days on market (DOM). Condos/Townhouses had an average of 60 DOM.

12both.png

KAPOWICH REAL ESTATE derives many benefits from its
memberships in the National Association of Realtors,
the California Association of Realtors, the Silicon Valley
Association of Realtors. Not the least of which is
their statistical information on real estate transactions.

→ No CommentsTags: Buying/Selling · Stats ~ Housing Updates

De Anza College class brought to you by Pat Kapowich “Buying & Selling Distressed Properties” Saturday, 2/27 @ 9AM-12PM ~ Featuring Real Estate Attorney Julia Wei!

February 2nd, 2010 · No Comments

Pat’s next De Anza class features guest speaker Real Estate Attorney Julia Wei!

Managing Risk, Expectations & Results with Lender Controlled Properties

Buyer and Seller Beware: Only prepared buyers and sellers should enter into transactions involving distressed properties. Short sales, pre-foreclosures and foreclosures are fraught with potential missteps and ramifications that are normally not found in an already stressful situation ~ the buying or selling of a home. Banks have become more aggressive toward buyers, sellers and their representative. Learning all sides of a transaction is paramount when negotiating, especially when the banks have loss mitigation departments that are overwhelmed and/or ill prepared.

small6593

Be a Savvy Consumer and Learn the Particulars:
• Loan Modifications vs Short Sales
• Short-Sales vs Foreclosures
• Pre-Foreclosure & Foreclosures
• Debt Relief Tax Consequences
• Banks Demanding Loss Repayment
• Agent Contracts vs Bank Contracts
• Dealing with Multiple Lenders

Instructors: Real Estate Attorney Julia Wei is a specialist in lending, escrow, title and bank controlled properties. Pat Kapowich is the Broker/Owner of Kapowich Real Estate in Cupertino. Pat is also a contributor to the Saturday Q & A column Market Wise in the San Jose Mercury News.

RSVP

Where: De Anza College
When: Saturday, February 27th, 2010
Time: 9AM to 12PM
Room: G-3
Fee: $39.00

→ No CommentsTags: Buying/Selling · Classes/Forums/Seminars · Distressed Properties/Sellers · Empty Suits/Bushwhackers